Tuesday, April 26, 2011

How We Deal With Grief

The last few weeks of my reading life have been an absolute dream as I started and finished two of my now favorite books of all time-
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Jonathan Safran Foer and The Year of Magical Thinking by Joan Didion. My month has been a marathon of beautiful writing. Although these two books are very different from one another in terms of genre, character-type and writing style, they do share one common and dominant theme- grief. Oskar experiences grief when his father is killed in 9/11, and Joan when her husband of 40 years dies of heart failure.

What struck me so immediately about the character of Oskar Schell was his matter-of-fact attitude and way about everything. Even his fathers death. And watching a nine year old boy not only lose his dad, but address it in the same way that he would address the weather report was almost more painful than if he had sobbed nonstop throughout the story. Because that was his way of dealing with grief- keeping it inside, not dealing with it. Oskar makes sure that everything is clean and tidy on the outside for people to see by not letting out the messy inside thoughts and words and actions and feelings which, I know from experience, is so much more painful. And you have to think about it- was Oskar making this concious decision? Was he choosing to keep it in for the sake of, say, his mom or grandma? No- he's nine years old, his dad just died- he doesn't know what to do or think or who to turn to. He's polite and smart and just not the kind of person who can lash out or break down or show people what he's really going through. He doesn't keep his father's last voicemail's a secret to spare his mother any more pain, he does it because he's terrified and confused and guilty. Because so much responsibility and so much agony has been placed on his tiny shoulders and he's only nine and the only way he knows to deal with grief is what automatically happens- and that's nothing. Because nothing happens if we don't make it happen, and Oskar, not knowing what to make happen, does nothing.
And so it stays inside.
And that's how he deals with grief.
And he's only nine.
And that breaks my heart.

Then there's Joan Didion, whose story is equally heartbreaking in a completely different way. Before I read this book, my theory was that grief was easier as you got older, as you came to expect and anticipate the deaths of friends and spouses who were, like you, nearing the ends of their lives. But this isn't true at all because as Joan says, when you're so in love, you don't see yourself as growing older,
"For Forty years I saw myself through John's eyes. I did not age. This year for the first time since I was twenty nine I saw myself through the eyes of others. This year for the first time since I was twenty nine I realized that my image of myself was of someone significantly younger".
She had spent two thirds of her life with this man, and just because he had to die, didn't make him actually dying any easier. When you come to depend on someone for everything, when you come to realize them as a literal part of you, when not a single day goes by that you don't see this person, talk to this person, touch this person, hug this person in 40 years, how big is the hole they leave behind? And how impossible is it to fill?

But what stands out the most, to me, about her book is that it's a book. That she relived and re-experienced every moment of this event and every feeling that followed for years to make this book. That she published it, releasing to the world her innermost thoughts in the most raw, personal, heartbreaking and beautiful way possible. That this is her way of dealing with grief- the only way she knows- writing.
"Grief turns out to be a place none of us know until we reach it. We anticipate (we know) that someone close to us could die, but we do not look beyond the few days or weeks that immediately follow such an imagined death. We misconstrue the nature of even those few days or weeks. We might expect if the death is sudden, to feel shock. We do not expect this shock to be obliterative, dislocating to both body and mind"
"Nor can we know ahead of the fact (and here lies the heart of the difference between grief was we imagine it and grief as it is) the unending absence that follows, the void, the very opposite of meaning, the relentless succession of moments during which we will confront the experience of meaninglessness itself."
"Life changes in the instant, the ordinary instant"
-Joan Didion, The Year of Magical Thinking
And Joan Didion is so right.
Because no one expects death or grief- not how it really turns out to be, at least. And no one knows how to handle it when it does come.
Not even the seemingly most clever and scholarly nine year old boy that ever lived.
Not even the 70 year old woman who's intelligent and experienced and put together.
No one.

Because our minds use logic to make an image of what we think something will be like or feel like or look like, and there is nothing logical about grief. Because as much as we may plan or organize or try to control how our lives will play out, what happens happens. And when faced with crisis, it's hard to stick to your plans.

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Revised and Published "Sometimes I Wish I Could Forget"

So, this is the New and Improved version of this:

Time is relative. When you're 14 years old, the last 4 years may have seemed like the longest, best, worst, most important, most painful, what-ever-it-is years of your life. Then, as a 50 year old, your life has been steady, settled for a while and the last four years seem unimportant, a nonentity. A senior in high school may think that the year can't go any slower- that it seems like a lifetime before they will graduate when, in the big picture, this year is only one tiny fraction of their life. We all live and die, and go unnoticed by many. Four years mean nothing in the grand scheme of things, but at the same time, can define someones entire life.

Now, take a moment to think about the last four years of your life. Think about what they meant, what they did, how they changed you as a person. Think about what things would be like had they never happened, what you would be like if they simply disappeared. One moment they were a piece of your history, a chunk of your memory, part of what made you you, and the next thing you know, they were just gone. It would be as if a part of your life never even existed, you suddenly re-winded. This is what happened to Naomi Porter.

She hit her head on slippery steps and in a split second, four years disappeared. Anything from after the age of 12 was simply erased from her memory- her mothers affair, her parents divorce, her boyfriend Ace, her best friend Will, her love for yearbook and tennis, her ability to drive, her lost virginity, her new house, her half sister- everything. The most eventful, vital years of her life were forgotten. Her world had become a mystery- why did she drop that class? Why did she fall for Ace? Where did she wear that dress? How did she have her hair? Did her father have a girlfriend? Did she like the girlfriend? She begins to search for clues to piece together her history with. She had to trust people to tell her pieces of her past, and to tell them honestly. Naomi's life became a complete nightmare of question and wondering. At the same time, though, her amnesia had given her a fresh start. At sixteen years old, she had basically no past. She could choose to simply start over, be a whole new person. She didn't remember the old one, and no one would know that it ever existed. When Naomi finally does remember everything, she hides it. She doesn't tell anyone that her memory is back because, she doesn't want it to be. Starting over felt good, why face the reality of her messy but true life if she didn’t have to?

This book, Memories of a Teenage Amnesiac, makes me think about what it's like to forget. Is it better to forget your mistakes? To live with no history? To start with a clean slate? Or, is the point of life to live with the decisions that you make? At one point in the book, Naomi comments that she thinks perhaps the only reason that her significant other, James liked her is because she has no past, because the present and the future can be what she chooses, what she wants them to be. There are times in my life when I think that nothing could ever get worse. When I feel as if a mid-life crisis is occuring 30 years premature and all I want to do is just give up on everything and everyone. I would kill to erase my mistakes. I would do anything to go back in time and just start over. But maybe everything does, despite how cliche this may sound, happen for a reason because if it didn’t, there would be no argument as to why Naomi shouldn’t forget. She just would, there would be no hesitation because there would be no reason why she shouldn’t.

In sixth grade, I said something awful about one of my closest friends that I’ve had for as long as I can remember. The thing is, I didn’t even mean what I said about her, and she overheard. I remember what made me feel the worst about it was that when I called to apologize and tell her it didn’t mean it, I didn’t want to lose her, yadda, yadda, ya she wasn’t angry-- just really hurt, sad. And, I’ll never forget how her voice sounded because I’d never ever heard it that way before and that made everything a million times worse. I remember in that moment, hating myself more than I ever have before, being so ashamed of what I’d done that still to this day, the only person that knows is my mom. I remember a list of things I would do to take it back going through my head. A stream of items or words or people or foods or anything I would give up if I could go back in time and have her back.
Anything.
Anything to loosen the tight, dry knot in the back of my throat or fill the empty, aching hole in my stomach.
I had become desperate like anyone in a similar situation would be.

But, I couldn’t. There was nothing I could do because I’m only human and I don’t have a fairy god-mother or Hermione’s time turner. Because I’d done something that so many had done before me and so many will do after me- made a possibly life-altering mistake. And I regretted it deeply but, like the others, I would have to live with that.

So what’s the upside to this? Why, if everyone wants so badly what Naomi has the opportunity to have, should she not take it? Because I made up with that friend and she’s still at my house practically everyday eating my families supply of cookies. Because, while what I said will always be there, we still have our run-around-like-4-year-olds-on-a-summer-afternoon kind of juvenile relationship. Because, since that day, I have tried as hard as I possibly can to not say a single bad thing about a friend behind their back, and it’s worked for the most part. Because I learned an important lesson in a painfully hard way but because of that, I’ll never forget it. And, if I did, who knows how many times I would’ve made that mistake again. Sometimes I think when you do something wrong, you just get a strike and a bit of luck and everything is OK. But, if you forget and keep on doing that thing, you’re out of luck and strikes and nothing turns out OK. Because, “Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it” and though this quote is overused in my writing that’s only it’s so true and so, so, vitally important to remember.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

I wish I could say that Leonardo DiCaprio made this movie what it is...

I never thought I'd say that a Shakespeare play became one of my favorite movies of all time (not to sound like an ignorant, modern-day teen or anything-- I love Shakespeare, of course. But, when thinking about movies, there's always Mean girls and Elf and The parent trap and The Lizzie McGuire movie to consider which top practically everything). Seriously though, This movie is amazing. When we began the Romeo and Juliet unit and the first excited whispers about the about the fact that we would actually be watching a movie in class (as if we've never done that before) began, everyone (or at least every girl (yes, including me)) wanted to know only one thing- "IS IT THE LEONARDO DICAPRIO VERSION?!?!?!?!?!". And when Ms.Robbins told us that no, it was not- it was the Baz Luhrmann version, and that it would not ever (in her class) be referred to as anything but the Baz Luhrmann version, I thought it was just a joke. Just something she established because she was (understandably) sick and tired of thirteen year old girls having panic attacks about how absolutely perfect and exquisite the young Leonardo DiCaprio was everytime he went on screen (especially in those beginning scenes in the sunset/beach/sycamore grove- oh.my.god.). However, along with the many other things that I learned from watching this movie in class, by the end I had come to the realization that that was not at all Ms.Robbin's reason (or at least not her main one) for naming this "The Baz Luhrmann version"-- it was because that man is a creative genius and though he may not be as beautiful as him, he deserves every ounce of credit for this visionary masterpiece.

I wanted to zoom in on one specific thing that may seem a little unimportant but, in reality, adds so much to this movie- color (and when I say color I mean how Luhrmann used color to symbolize, not just the fact that he used it instead of black and white or something). When you're making a movie, you have so much more room for creative-ness and there are so many more visual things that you just physically couldn't have in a play. Baz Luhrmann uses this to his full advantage always and has "creative-movie-things" in practically every single shot+ this shines through especially in his choice of color uses. He chose yellow and blue to represent Montague and Capulet, and if you watch for these colors throughout, it's something that shows up all the time and one of those details that you may never notice, but if you do, you appreciate even more all the thought and work put into this movie and it's intentional craft moves. Color comes up in the backlight they use on characters faces in close-ups, it comes up in backdrops, it comes up in the clothes and the colors of their cars, it comes up in the fish between Romeo and Juliet, it comes up in the church, it comes up really everywhere, and everytime it does, it means something. It's there for a reason. And, even if people don't consciously notice these colors or realize what they represent, I think that having each side and each character on either side being visually affiliated with a color really helps the audience remember and understand each characters strong disposition and opinion and personality even if it's just their brain automatically and unconsciously making that connection.

I think that, in general, people learn a lot more when they do something in school than at home. Maybe it's because they're paying attention or because teachers are there, pointing out smart things. But, either way, it's really remarkable how much more I got out of watching this movie once in school than the millions of times I've seen it at home. It's one of those movies where you know it's beautiful and thought out and special for some reason but, as a thirteen year old not-film-expert, you can't seen to put your finger on specifically what that reason is. It's everything- it's the way that the light hits their faces- a bit sharper for Tybalt and softer for Benvolio, it's the way everything means something. How Romeo and Juliet's meeting foreshadows and represents what their future will be-- on opposite sides of the fish tank, fish of Montague+ Capulet colors and layers of water pushing them apart always. It's the beautiful modern costume party take on the Capulet dinner and how each costume represents it's wearer. It's how he changes the whole ending without adding or taking away a single word. It's how he makes everything fit together, work just right, even hundreds of years later. Watching the movie now that all these things are brought to my attention is overwhelming because every thought I have is "blue there!", "yellow over there!", "close up!", "what.does.it.mean...?". I've never taken a film study class before or even heard anyone talk about it so, maybe this little taste has gotten me anxious and it will soon ware off, but either way, I'm excited. I'm excited that I got so much out of this, and I'm excited to finish dissecting the play, and I'm excited about how I will view the movie when I, inevitably, see it again, and I'm excited that I'm actually excited about this, and I'm really excited to go out and rent all of these.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Lately, I've been trying really hard to be catholic.

To believe in god, or fate, or bible stories. To go to church every Sunday, or confession, or just to pray once in a while. I feel like religion is an amazing thing to have as a part of one's life. I know, that sounds weird and poser-ish and completely the opposite of what a good catholic thinks/does. I should just believe. I shouldn't have to try or think about it. It should just happen. I shouldn't want it because it seems fun or helpful or exciting or exotic. I should want it, have it, simply because I believe. But I don't-- I want it because it seems like a good thing to have. And that's really awful, but it's true.

I'm growing up in a time and place and group of people where being religious is... well... weird, not normal, frowned upon. Most of my closest friends, even, would be weirded out or confused if I told them that I believed in god. Maybe that's just the people I know, and I'm taking to much liberty in generalizing that statement, but it certainly seems that way to me.

At this point, it's not even like I'm hiding a part of myself because I haven't believed in or done anything that is required to really be a catholic since probably 2nd grade. Yes, my parents are catholic, I was raised catholic- I got baptised and I had my first communion and now, I'm working towards my confirmation. but, does that make me catholic if I, myself, don't really, truly believe?

Hang in there, there's a purpose to all this self-absorbed rambling, I swear.

My point is this: Maybe I have a hard time believing in god because I just do. Because I've always been logical and couldn't picture things like resurrection or turning water to wine or just the fact that someone controls everything we do or think. Things that require some magic, a great imagination, and faith. But, maybe it's because of the people I meet and spend my time with. Maybe the teenage disapproval of religion is shaping me as a person, is turning me into something I'm not, or something I am or should be or was.

When I read Looking For Alaska by John Green, I can't help but think about Pudge's character and who he was before boarding school. I can't help but wonder if he would've been someone entirely different had he stayed at home, and whether that would've been a bad or good thing. When he arrived there, he couldn't even smoke a cigarette without coughing. Then, through joining forces with The Colonel and Alaska he became someone that his old self never would've imagined. Is it good that he smokes and drinks and plays pranks and sets off fireworks and watches porn? No. Is it good that this is the only way he came to make friends and fit in at his school? Absolutely not. But, it's reality. Our society has such a twisted definition of popularity, what it is to be "cool", such an ugly view on beauty or fame, people changing themselves for all the wrong reasons.

Was Pudge always meant to be that way? Did he just need someone to help him realize it? Do people have a certain self that is determined in their genes? A real, true personality, waiting to come out at just the right time, with just the right people? Or, is how we are, who we are, determined by experiences? Will the people we interact with as children determine our lives as adults?

I hope this post wasn't to disorganized and pointless. It feels like it was, a bit, but I hope you can still make sense of it and get something out of my weird, scrambled thoughts.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Mentor Blog Posts

http://eveningswithdrfutterman.blogspot.com/2011/01/ive-been-feeling-so-strange-lately.html#comments

Time and time again, I feel myself being drawn to reading Annie's blog. She's more than just an amazing writer- every single post has such a specific voice and character to it (not to mention her amazing vocabulary that I can't seem to not mention every time I talk about her blog). I find it really inspiring to see not only the minimum reading entry per week, but also extra creative/independent writing or random thoughts every time I look at her blog. Every aspect of it from her background, to description, to title of blog, to each and every post shines through as "purely Annie". I love, love, love her metaphors and creative expressions, and the picture she chose for her "poem, art response" post. As time goes on, I will continue to look back at "Evenings With Dr.Futterman"often in the hopes that reading her writing, which is so drastically different and overall stronger than mine, will help me grow as a writer, reader, student, and person.

Whoops, I just realized that I forgot to write anything about the actual post that I put a link to. So, I love this post basically because it displays so perfectly what I described before. Annie does a brilliant job of extending her ideas and connecting what she's thinking about in her own life and in the world, to her books and what she's reading.

http://piasela.blogspot.com/2011/01/sense-of-normalcy-and-perfecting-our.html#comments

What I love about this post is how real it is, how everyone can connect to what she's talking about because it's just so true. What I admire most about Pia's blog in general is how beautifully she connects the book she is reading to real life, how she'll start with a pararaph or two to draw you in, get you thinking, and then give some context, tell you how it relates. A lot of the blogs I read are rants about life/things distantly/not-at-all connected to their reading or a very long retell with perhaps a few sentences explaining their thoughts on the book. Plenty of those blog posts are perhaps written well and thoroughly thought out, but somewhat defeat the point of a "reading blog". What I envy so much about Pia's posts is her perfect balance between the two- not too much retell, just enough theorizing and ranting. Her thoughts are always very organized and well thought out-- very obviously not left to the last minute.

http://ferny-nandez.blogspot.com/2011/01/when-time-comes-to-leave-just-walk-away.html

I am in love with not only her poem response, but also the piece of art that she chose for this post. The imagery and story that she creates off of this picture is so lovely and just makes me smile (perhaps partially because Ferny wrote it). I also idolize practically any poem that rhymes in any way, just because I love rhyming. On a broader note, I also really really admire that she has bits of independent/creative/extra writing included in her blog here and there.

I think that having an ELA blog community like this is and has been such an amazing experience that we should all take full advantage of by putting real and true effort into every post we write, and trying hard to go beyond the minimum 1 post per week mold. I realize that I personally haven't been writing much more than is required, which is why I applaud those who have (like Izzy, Annie, Pia) and I definitely want to work harder to do that in the 2nd semester of this year.

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Lambey by Elena Nazzaro


Its been a while since you noticed me
a year
or two
maybe three?

You jump
and work
and sleep
and run
but, I never join in on the fun

Your only friend
was what I used to be
Your favorite pal
that was me

What's happend now?
did you forget?
my snow white fur
is gray
and wet

I miss the way
we'd laugh
and play
I miss the day
we ran away

Just you and me
a trip
of some kind
But now there's no "you"
because I was left behind

Thursday, January 13, 2011

End of Winter

End of Winter
BY LOUISE GLÜCK

Over the still world, a bird calls
waking solitary among black boughs.

You wanted to be born; I let you be born.
When has my grief ever gotten
in the way of your pleasure?

Plunging ahead
into the dark and light at the same time
eager for sensation

as though you were some new thing, wanting
to express yourselves

all brilliance, all vivacity

never thinking
this would cost you anything,
never imagining the sound of my voice
as anything but part of you—

you won't hear it in the other world,
not clearly again,
not in birdcall or human cry,

not the clear sound, only
persistent echoing
in all sound that means good-bye, good-bye—

the one continuous line
that binds us to each other

I picked this poem because of the title, which probably isn't a good rule to go
by but, I had no idea where to start my search for the perfect poem for this
blog post, as I am, unfortunately no expert on poetry. Winter is, despite how
I may be mocked for it, and despite the "are-you-insane??" looks received
when I say this, my favorite season. Yes, at times the snow can be
cumbersome or the cold can be infuriating but, I think that the general magic
of winter completely makes up for that. You have no idea how badly I want to
go off on a rant about winter and all its wonders and angelic beauty-- the first
snow, cookies, sweaters, fires, etc, etc. I could honestly go on forever about
this topic, but it's completely besides the point and I have a feeling that I'll
want to make a blog post about this at a later date anyway. Moving on... I
picked the poem because I thought it would be about winter. I pictured
stunning imagery of the heartbreak that the author felt when winter and all its
magic disappeared for another year-- exactly how I start to feel towards the
beginning of march. This poem, however, is nothing close to what I had in
mind. Whatsoever. In fact, until I copied and pasted the it into my blog post,
I had completely forgotten the title and hadn't looked at it as a seasonal poem
as I read it.

"never thinking
this would cost you anything,
never imagining the sound of my voice
as anything but part of you—"

This line strikes me as a sort of "you never know what you had till you lost it"
type of idea, which is something definitely echoing in the back of my head
throughout the poem. What the author is trying to get across in this line is the
image of someone or something behaving recklessly, taking for granted "the
sound of my voice"- something that has obviously always been part of their life
and is now being taken away.
This poem is about karma, in a way, about realizing what you have before it's
gone-- it's about the fact that if you're someone who never let anyones grief in
get in the way of the way of your own pleasure, it will catch up to you
eventually. You will lose all you have, live in "the other world" where the only
sound is the persistent echoing of "goodbye, goodbye"-- the one continuous line
that binds you to the past.
The idea of winter or the "end of winter" is a metaphor in this poem. It's
about someones falling from power, crashing and burning. It's about
someone or something as strong and fierce and alive as winter when all
they've done and forgotten about is finally catching up with them. Everyone
has, no doubt, hurt someone without realizing. Everyone, at times takes even
the most precious things for granted. Everyone has "plunged ahead in all
brilliance, all vivacity" without stopping to consider the consequences. This
poem is about someone who does these things far too often- someone who
abuses these privileges that everyone has. This poem shows you what can
happen to anyone, at any time.